The claim underneath the kindness
Torn argues that Latter-day Saint culture is the load-bearing cause of disaffiliation — that it substitutes conformity for belonging, fear for love, and boundary-keeping for nourishment. Strong's own word for what results is starvation. Spiritual starvation.
Read that as a metaphor and it is a sermon. Read it as a description of what is happening to millions of people, and it becomes something else: a prediction.
If a culture is starving its people, that should be visible in the people.
Starvation leaves marks. It shows up in how loved people felt growing up. In how much meaning they find in their lives. In whether they are depressed. In whether the young ones stay. In how long they live.
All of those things have been measured — repeatedly, by institutions with no stake in the answer. Harvard. Pew. UCLA. Notre Dame. The University of Chicago. Some of the largest social-science instruments ever built have pointed themselves at this small religious group, some of them for decades.
So the question is not whether Strong's thesis is compassionate. It plainly is. The question is whether the marks are there.